🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in graves at risk from shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation details a series of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer locations. Authorities say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They wanted this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving abroad. His parent said she could not sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

The lack of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want more sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. We need productive local conversations to find the right answers for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, offering a theological perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.